The Battle for the Soul of Buy Nothing
How an idealistic community for exchanging free stuff tried to break away from Facebook and ended up breaking apart….


At the one-year anniversary of its launch, the Buy Nothing app had been downloaded 600,000 times, but only 91,000 people were regularly using it, not many more than at the beginning. Meanwhile, the Facebook groups from which the founders had disengaged were thriving without them. Global membership had surpassed 7 million. When I asked what Rockefeller and Clark thought would happen to Buy Nothing Inc. if they couldnât come up with additional funding, they said they werenât interested in thinking in such fatalistic terms. But when I posed the same question to Williams, the COO, he said heâd considered it. âWeâre adults,â he said. âWeâve got to shut it down.â
Rockefeller and Clark hadnât given up, though. They decided to switch tactics yet again. Over Thanksgiving weekend, they changed the Buy Nothing website so that when someone showed up looking for information about starting a Facebook group, they were directed to fill out a form that would automatically be sent to Rockefeller and Clark. The form asked people whether they had tried the app, offering a download link. If, after trying it, they still wanted to start a Facebook group, Rockefeller or Clark would build the group for them.
Rockefeller and Clark may have realized that if they couldnât compete with Facebook, they would do better to take control of what theyâd started. A couple of days after Christmas, Schwalb opened up Facebook to find that her OG group had vanished. Months earlier, Buy Nothing Inc. had secured trademarks on the phrases âBuy Nothingâ and âBuy Nothing Projectâ and reported the OG group to Facebook for trademark infringement.
Clark and Rockefeller told me that while they wanted to give local admins flexibility in running their groups, Gifting With Integrity had crossed a line. The group was aggressively promoting an approach that the founders had discarded; it had combined the Buy Nothing brand with the Gifting With Integrity name; it was disseminating old documents without what the founders considered proper attribution. âI donât get to say âIâm making shoes, and theyâre called Nike, and they have the swoosh on them, and you should buy my Nikes,ââ Rockefeller told me. To Schwalb and her co-admins, this was a stretch. For one thing, Gifting With Integrity wasnât asking people to buy anything.
In January, Rockefeller and Clark posted a message to the Facebook group for local admins, elaborating on their stance. They were just trying to protect their trademark, they said. To that end, they were asking that all Facebook groups link to a Buy Nothing web page. Rockefeller and Clark told me that they required this link so that admins wouldnât have to make manual updates whenever the rules changed. But Schwalb noticed that the web page, conveniently, promoted the Buy Nothing app.
To get back on Facebook without reprisal, the OG group changed its name to, simply, Gifting With IntegrityâOG Admin Support Group, removing the part about Buy Nothing. They encouraged local gifting groups to change their names as well. Their website reads, âWe are not affiliated with, nor do we support in any fashion, the Buy Nothing Project.â On Facebook, the Gifting With Integrity group has 1,500 members, all overseeing local groups.
My own Buy Nothing group, in Fort Collins, was one of those that followed Gifting With Integrityâs lead. Itâs now called the Northeast Fort Collins Gifting Community. A friend shared with me a message sent to the group by an admin announcing the change: âWe truly believe in building our little hyperlocal community and plan to continue to operate by the original principles that make this group great. We donât want that to disappear into the machinery of the new monetized system.â When I asked Schwalb how many local groups had discarded the Buy Nothing name and adopted Gifting With Integrityâs approach, she replied, âWeâre not keeping numbers, and we most definitely donât intend to, because I donât want to turn into the Buy Nothing conglomerate.â
In some ways, Rockefeller and Clarkâs loss of control made me think of women inventors who hadnât gotten credit for their products: Rosalind Franklin, the scientist who helped discover the double helix; Lizzie Magie, the gamemaker who invented Monopoly. But then, Rockefeller and Clark had started Buy Nothing as a counteragent to the capitalist ethic that concentrates wealth and power in the hands of the few while ruining lives, communities, and the environment. The project had been a success, owing to their efforts, certainly, and also to those of the thousands of volunteers who made Buy Nothing their own. If the movement ended up splintering into an unaccountable mess of local variationsâand Rockefeller and Clark didnât make a cent in the processâmaybe that was the most fitting ending possible.